Over the past several decades, cosmological exploration has steadily advanced toward a precision framework aimed at describing the universe through a set of fundamental parameters with increasing confidence. Despite this progress, conflicting findings have introduced a serious challenge to the field. At the center of this issue is the Hubble Tension, a persistent and widening discrepancy between measurements derived from the early universe and estimates of the universe’s expansion rate based on observations of the local cosmos.
Image Credit: Triff/Shutterstock.com
A Universe in Conflict
While relying on independent techniques to measure cosmic expansion, the results have split cosmologists into two seemingly irreconcilable camps. The statistical discrepancy between the two leading models is significant, and rather than narrowing with improved optical and telescopic technologies, it has grown more pronounced over time.1
On one side: the "distance ladder" measurements, which examine the local universe and imply a quicker expansion. The "early relic" approaches, on the other hand, forecast a far slower rate by examining the state of the universe just after the Big Bang.2
This dispute is a serious threat to the Standard Model of Cosmology, not just a technical argument between astronomers. If both sides are correct, then a crucial component is absent from the model that explains the universe's composition and history. With missions like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the European Space Agency's Gaia, this puzzle has sparked a new era of research that is expanding the theories of the cosmos.3
Enter the Hubble Constant
The Hubble Constant (H0) is the number that characterizes the current rate of expansion of the cosmos. For approximately every 3.26 million light-years that separates an earth observer from a galaxy, H0 describes how fast that galaxy is moving away. Determining H0 tells us not only the current expansion rate of the universe, but also how old it is and how it is likely to evolve in the future.
The cosmic distance ladder is typically used to measure H0. Three main steps are involved in this process:4
- Parallax: By observing how the stars in the Milky Way change in relation to the backdrop as Earth revolves around the Sun, the distance between nearer stars can be determined.
- Standard Candles: Making use of stars of known intrinsic brightness, such as RR Lyrae stars or Cepheid variables, their distance to their home galaxies can be calculated by comparing their apparent brightness to their "actual" brightness.
- Supernovae: Connecting Type Ia supernovae, which are so bright that they can be observed for billions of light-years, to these stars.
Using this ladder, the expansion rate consistently lands at approximately 73 km/s/Mpc, with only a 1% uncertainty.
No time now? Download the PDF for later
The Tension Explained: Two Incompatible Measurements
Comparing the distance ladder results to the early relic method creates an unexplainable discrepancy. The early relic method begins with the "seeds" of the universe rather than constructing a ladder outward. Scientists can measure the acoustic scale by observing the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), which is the remnant glow from the Big Bang. This tangible standard ruler was created when matter and radiation interacted at a time when the cosmos was just 380,000 years old.
The early relic method yields an H0 value of roughly 67 km/s/Mpc. Both the early relic and local measurement techniques report precision at the 1% level. Yet the gap between their respective H0 estimates is large enough to generate serious concern within the cosmological community, prompting researchers to question the reliability and underlying assumptions of each approach.
Scientific and Industrial Implications
The Hubble tension has significant ramifications. Established ideas of the physics behind the Big Bang might be doubted if the distance ladder is accurate and the early relic technique is incorrect. On the other hand, if the early relic approach is correct, then measurements based on stars and supernovae may be skewed by subtle, previously unrecognized, systematic effects that could be distorting the distance ladder results.
From a scientific perspective, the Hubble Tension could represent the first compelling hint of “new physics”, a reimagined model that could include:
- Early Dark Energy: An additional expansionary burst that altered the acoustic scale in the early universe.
- Sterile neutrinos: Novel subatomic particles that have an impact on the early development of the universe.
- Modified Gravity: On the biggest scales, theories based on Einstein's General Relativity may exhibit different behaviors.
High-precision detectors and huge data-processing pipelines have been developed as a result of the industrial and technological efforts to address Hubble tension. For example, the Gaia mission has achieved unparalleled precision in cataloguing approximately two billion stars. The algorithms created in astrophysics to handle this big data frequently end up in industrial settings like remote sensing, satellite navigation, and even sophisticated medical imaging.
Leading Theories and Technological Frontiers
The SH0ES Project (Supernovae, H0, for the Equation of State of Dark Energy) is a high-precision astrophysical collaboration led by Nobel laureate Adam Riess.5 This remains the gold standard of the distance ladder approach. Their study, meticulously refining the links between parallax, Cepheids, and supernovae, has shown that even adding the "twinkling" of the atmosphere or the dust in distant galaxies, the 73km/s/Mpc value for H0 remains stubbornly robust.
From a technological standpoint, advancements in space-based interferometry and adaptive optics have opened new avenues for exploration, enabling more precise observations and expanding our ability to probe the universe with greater clarity and depth. Ground-based telescopes can now achieve resolutions once possible only from space, thanks to laser-based adaptive optics systems that effectively correct for atmospheric distortion and eliminate the familiar “twinkle” caused by turbulence. Speckle-cell interferometry and other methods, on the other hand, regard the atmosphere as a known optical component that can be eliminated computationally. These advances expand the overlap between the ladder’s rungs by allowing astronomers to identify standard candles in galaxies that were previously too faint to detect, strengthening the calibration between successive distance measurements and reducing gaps in the cosmic distance scale.
Future Developments and Opportunities
The coming decade is widely expected to be one of the most compelling periods in the history of cosmology. Observing at distances far beyond the reach of the Hubble Space Telescope, the James Webb Space Telescope is now monitoring Cepheids and Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) stars, extending the reach and precision of distance measurements deeper into the universe. JWST's infrared observations let it see through the cosmic dust that frequently interferes with clarity, which may help determine whether the Hubble Tension is due to misrepresented noise or actual cosmic oddity.
In addition, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) offers a fresh perspective on Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) by mapping the universe's large-scale structure in astonishing detail.1 The missing link between the 67km/s/Mpc and 73km/s/Mpc may be provided by DESI if it discovers an unanticipated change in the expansion rate over the last few billion years.
The Hubble Tension presents an opportunity to learn something completely new about the nature of reality. Its resolution will reshape our understanding of the Universe, regardless of whether the solution is found in a buried mistake in the star catalog or in a radical new particle that existed at the beginning of time. The tension is still there for the time being, a quiet but humbling reminder that the cosmos still has mysteries it is not yet prepared to reveal.
We explore how the Big Bang forged the first elements here
References and Further Reading
- Siegal, E. (August 14, 2024) The Hubble tension: still unresolved, despite new measurements. [Online] BIG Think. Available at: https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/hubble-tension-unresolved-new-measurements/
- Aloni, Daniel, Asher Berlin, Melissa Joseph, Martin Schmaltz, and Neal Weiner. "A step in understanding the Hubble tension." Physical Review D 105, no. 12 (2022): 123516.
- Dainotti, Maria, Biagio De Simone, Giovanni Montani, Tiziano Schiavone, and Gaetano Lambiase. "The Hubble constant tension: current status and future perspectives through new cosmological probes." arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10572 (2023).
- Gossan, Sarah, and Christian Ott. "Methods of measuring astronomical distances." Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory-LIGO (2012).
- Riess, Adam G. "The expansion of the universe is faster than expected." Nature Reviews Physics 2, no. 1 (2020): 10-12.
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.