Quantum mechanics, the most precise theory of nature to date, still harbours one of the deepest conceptual mysteries: the measurement problem. At its heart lies the paradox that measurement appears to “collapse” a quantum system from a probabilistic wave function into a definite outcome. This phenomenon is both deeply philosophical and highly important for emerging quantum technologies.1
Image Credit: peterschreiber.media/Shutterstock.com
When we measure a quantum system, such as the spin of an electron or the polarization of a photon, we always find it in a definite state. However, before the measurement, the system exists in a superposition of many possible outcomes. The question of why this collapse happens, how it occurs, and under what conditions it takes place remains a subject of ongoing debate.1
This unresolved issue is especially pressing in quantum computing, where understanding and controlling decoherence (a kind of effective collapse) is essential, in quantum cryptography, where security exploits the collapse process, and in foundational physics, where reconciling quantum mechanics with gravity may require rethinking collapse altogether.1
The Role of Probability in Quantum Theory
Quantum mechanics does not provide certainties; it provides probabilities. This statistical nature is a defining feature of the theory. The fundamental object in quantum mechanics is the wave function (or quantum state), a mathematical function that encodes the amplitudes of all possible outcomes of a measurement.2
These amplitudes do not correspond directly to physical probabilities. Instead, Max Born’s rule tells us that the square of the absolute value of the amplitude gives the probability density of finding the system in a particular state.3
For example, in the classic double-slit experiment, a single electron passes through a barrier with two slits and is detected on a screen. Over many repetitions, an interference pattern emerges not because each electron passes through both slits and interferes with itself in a classical sense, but because its wave function creates the pattern.3
The probabilistic interpretation is not a limitation of our measurement apparatus; it is a fundamental aspect of quantum theory. Yet, paradoxically, a single measurement always gives a definite outcome. This tension lies at the core of the measurement problem.3
Download your PDF copy now!
What Does It Mean to Collapse a Quantum State?
Collapse refers to the process in which a quantum system transitions from a superposition to a definite eigenstate upon measurement. Mathematically, this transition is abrupt and non-unitary, in contrast to the smooth, deterministic evolution dictated by the Schrödinger equation.4
This is most starkly illustrated in the double-slit experiment with detectors placed at the slits. If we try to measure which slit the electron goes through, the interference pattern disappears. The act of measurement “collapses” the wave function into one of the possible paths.4
This collapse is not akin to classical observation. In classical physics, measuring a system does not fundamentally alter it. In quantum physics, however, observation changes the system’s state. This idea is closely linked to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle: the more precisely we know one observable (like position), the less precisely we can know its conjugate (like momentum). Measurement injects an unavoidable disturbance into the system, changing its state. Collapse, then, is a deeply non-classical phenomenon, and various interpretations attempt to make sense of it.5
Interpretations of Measurement and Collapse
Over the past century, several interpretations have sought to explain what measurement and collapse truly mean. Each presents a different metaphysical view of reality, often leading to testable but so far inconclusive predictions.
Copenhagen Interpretation: This traditional view holds that the wave function represents our knowledge, and collapse occurs when an observation is made. It assumes a classical-quantum divide, placing the observer outside the quantum system.6
Many-Worlds Interpretation: This view denies collapse entirely. Instead, all possible outcomes of a quantum measurement occur, but in separate, non-communicating branches of the universe. While deterministic and elegant, it challenges our sense of reality and raises questions about probability and experience.7
Objective Collapse Theories: Proposals like the GRW (Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber) model or Penrose’s gravity-induced collapse suggest that collapse is a real, spontaneous physical process that occurs randomly or when certain physical thresholds (like mass or complexity) are reached. These theories aim to unify quantum mechanics with a realist ontology and have inspired searches for experimental evidence.7
QBism and Relational Quantum Mechanics: These interpretations reject a universal wave function and instead view the wave function as subjective, dependent on the observer’s knowledge or interaction history. Measurement, then, becomes a personal Bayesian update, not a physical collapse.7
None of these interpretations has yet garnered consensus, and the debate continues, straddling physics and philosophy.
Real-World Implications in Technology and Research
Far from being a merely academic puzzle, wave function collapse plays a crucial role in quantum technologies. Qubits rely on superposition and entanglement to perform computations. However, collapse (often via environmental decoherence) destroys quantum information. Understanding and delaying collapse is essential for building scalable quantum processors.
Recent experiments, such as those reported by Agrawal et al. (2024), observe measurement-induced phase transitions (MIPTs), wherein continuous measurements transition a system from a quantum-coherent to a collapsed, classical-like state. Their experiments show that quantum systems can be tuned across a critical threshold where observable collapse occurs as a phase transition.8
Quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols like BB84 rely on the fact that measurement collapses a quantum state. An eavesdropper trying to intercept quantum keys necessarily collapses the state, alerting legitimate parties. Thus, the collapse becomes a security feature.8
Precision measurements in sensing devices (like atomic clocks or gravitational wave detectors) hinge on maintaining coherent quantum states. Collapse limits sensitivity, so techniques like weak measurement or delayed choice experiments are employed to extract information while minimizing disturbance.8
Adrian Kent's work proposes hypothetical readout devices that could reveal local quantum states without triggering full collapse. These ideas, though speculative, suggest that gravity might influence collapse and that observing such effects could yield insights into semiclassical gravity or consciousness-linked collapses.1
In systems like cavity QED, engineered interactions can cause controlled collapse and revival of quantum states. Kirchmair et al. demonstrated collapse and revival due to the Kerr effect, where nonlinearity in superconducting cavities produces Schrödinger cat states from coherent inputs. This ability to engineer collapse offers tools for quantum control and logic gates.9
Future Directions in Understanding Quantum Measurement
Despite immense progress, the measurement problem in quantum mechanics remains unsolved. Researchers are actively investigating several promising frontiers. One avenue explores whether gravity plays a role in causing collapse. Roger Penrose and others have proposed that space-time itself may not tolerate being in a superposition, and experiments that test quantum interference in massive objects could shed light on this possibility.10
Another area involves testing interpretations of quantum mechanics through MIPTs, which provide a novel framework. These transitions, observed in scalable trapped-ion systems without the need for post selection, offer a potential path to defining collapse regimes in operational terms.8
In the field of quantum device engineering, future technologies such as quantum sensors and processors will increasingly depend on the ability to control or circumvent collapse. Methods like quantum error correction, feedback control, and weak measurement will play a central role.8
At the same time, foundational experiments such as delayed choice tests, entanglement swapping, and weak measurement protocols continue to explore the nature of measurement. Institutions like NASA and CERN are using advanced quantum sensors to investigate the boundaries of macroscopic superpositions and collapse behaviour.11
Ultimately, understanding why observation collapses quantum states may transform our view of reality. Whether the resolution lies in new physical principles, the role of consciousness, or a more complete quantum theory, the pursuit itself is reshaping both our technologies and our understanding of the universe.
References and Further Studies
- Kent, A., Quantum State Readout, Collapses, Probes, and Signals. Physical Review D 2021, 103, 064061.
- Pitowsky, I., Quantum Mechanics as a Theory of Probability. In Physical Theory and Its Interpretation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Bub, Springer: 2006; pp 213-240.
- Stoica, O. C., Born Rule: Quantum Probability as Classical Probability. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 2025, 64, 1-20.
- Bassi, A., Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: Dynamical Collapse Theories. Oxford Research Encyclopedias 2021, ---.
- Peng, X.-F.; Luo, Y.-H.; Zhu, J.; Hua, B.-H.; Chen, X.-N.; Lian, D.-D.; Chen, Z.-W.; Chen, X.-S., Repeatedly Readable State, Spontaneous Collapse, and Quantum/Classical Boundary. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11656 2022.
- Henderson, J. R., Classes of Copenhagen Interpretations: Mechanisms of Collapse as Typologically Determinative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2010, 41, 1-8.
- Bassi, A.; Dorato, M.; Ulbricht, H., Collapse Models: A Theoretical, Experimental and Philosophical Review. Entropy 2023, 25, 645.
- Agrawal, U.; Lopez-Piqueres, J.; Vasseur, R.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Potter, A. C., Observing Quantum Measurement Collapse as a Learnability Phase Transition. Physical Review X 2024, 14, 041012.
- Kirchmair, G.; Vlastakis, B.; Leghtas, Z.; Nigg, S. E.; Paik, H.; Ginossar, E.; Mirrahimi, M.; Frunzio, L.; Girvin, S. M.; Schoelkopf, R. J., Observation of Quantum State Collapse and Revival Due to the Single-Photon Kerr Effect. Nature 2013, 495, 205-209.
- Hawking, S.; Penrose, R., The Nature of Space and Time; Princeton University Press, 2010.
- Kitching, J.; Kumar, P.; Berkeland, D.; Braje, D.; Burke, J.; Guha, S.; Metcalf, A.; Walsworth, R. Independent Panel Report for Technical Assessment of Nasa and External Quantum Sensing Capabilities; National Aeronautics and Space Administration: 2023.
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.