Where Are We on Space Debris in 2025?

Space debris, made up of non-functional, human-made objects orbiting Earth, is becoming a growing threat to the long-term sustainability of satellite operations and space research. Once considered a minor issue, it has escalated rapidly due to the sharp increase in space launches.

Image Credit: Frame Stock Footage/Shutterstock.com

The Growing Threat of Orbital Congestion

Space debris, which comprises spent rocket stages, dead satellites, and pieces from more than 640 break-up incidents, has threatened spacecraft integrity, satellite performance, and orbital stability since the start of the space age in 1957.¹ The high velocity of space debris significantly amplifies the risk it poses. For example, impacts on the International Space Station (ISS) Cupola windows, and the more than 30 collision avoidance maneuvers conducted since 1999, highlight how even millimeter-sized particles can cause serious damage. In Low-Earth Orbit (LEO), debris can travel at speeds of up to 17,500 mph, making their kinetic energy enough to puncture spacecraft or compromise critical systems.² Collisions involving larger debris (objects over 10 cm) can lead to catastrophic fragmentation, significantly worsening the problem. Such events risk triggering the Kessler Syndrome, a cascading chain of collisions that could render entire orbital regions unusable for decades, severely impacting both current and future space operations.²

The long-term untreated harm is predicted to negatively affect roughly 1.95% of global GDP, making addressing this challenge not just an operational but also an economic one.³ To maintain the orbital environment, a systematic, all-encompassing approach that emphasizes mitigation, control, and protection is essential.

Download the PDF of the article

Mapping the Debris – What’s in Orbit Today?

The magnitude of the debris problem is highlighted by the vast amount and diversity of material that is now orbiting the Earth. Currently there are more than 10,800 tons of space objects in orbit overall.⁴ Even though approximately 45,300 objects larger than 10 cm are actively tracked and catalogued by major space organizations including the US Space Surveillance Network (SSN) and the European Space Agency (ESA)², these tracked objects only make up a small portion of the threat. More importantly, an alarming 130 million pieces smaller than 1 cm are currently circling the earth, with an estimated 1 million chunks between 1 and 10 cm.

These smaller, untracked, yet extremely destructive fragments provide a constant and unpredictable threat. The density of debris is highest in low Earth orbit (LEO) because of the concentration of operational satellites, new large-scale constellations, and the buildup of older rocket bodies and non-functional spacecraft. Debris is found at different altitudes, ranging from the crowded LEO to Medium-Earth Orbit (MEO) and Geostationary Orbit (GEO).^{1, 2}

Debris sources are primarily divided into three categories: pieces from anomalous events, mission-related debris, and satellite breakup debris. The devastating potential of collisions was glaringly demonstrated by the 2021 ASAT test on the abandoned Cosmos 1408, which produced over 1,500 pieces of trackable debris and greatly exacerbated the orbital environment².

Despite international efforts to address the issue, the growing debris population is being fueled by inconsistent compliance with post-mission disposal guidelines and the increasing use of short-lived satellites like CubeSats. Some countries continue to overlook established regulations, complicating global mitigation strategies. This highlights the urgent need for more advanced tracking systems and a unified approach to prioritize the removal of the largest and most hazardous debris

Mitigation and Prevention – Keeping New Missions Clean

Preventative debris mitigation requires a four-step strategy for long-term orbital sustainability⁵.

• Step 1: Design for Impact Resistance
  This begins with selecting durable materials, simplifying structural designs, and minimizing exposed surface areas. These choices reduce the likelihood and severity of damage from high-speed debris impacts.
• Step 2: Remote Monitoring and Tracking
  Global sensor networks are used to continuously track space debris, predict its orbital paths, and compile detailed risk databases. This real-time monitoring is essential for early threat detection and informed decision-making.
• Step 3: Active Avoidance Maneuvers
  Equipped with onboard sensors, modern spacecraft can autonomously assess collision risks and execute real-time course adjustments. These maneuvers help avoid debris without requiring ground intervention.
• Step 4: Impact Mitigation Strategies
  As a final layer of defense, spacecraft employ physical shielding and adjust their orientation strategically to reduce the likelihood of critical damage during unavoidable encounters with smaller debris.

Additionally, global Debris Mitigation Standards enforce responsible design, including built-in deorbiting mechanisms and rocket body passivation to prevent future fragmentation.

Active Debris Removal (ADR) – Technology in Action

While preventing the creation of new debris is essential, Active Debris Removal (ADR) is equally critical for reducing the current collision risk. Massive, high-risk objects already in orbit pose a persistent danger, and their removal is necessary to prevent further fragmentation and protect the long-term viability of space operations.⁶ The goal of ADR is to create technologies that are specifically designed to remove big fragments that may otherwise start a Kessler cascade. Robotic arms, nets, harpoons, and even contactless techniques like lasers or concentrated air drag enhancement to safely deorbit debris are among the key technologies being developed and tested. ADR is an essential intervention because the orbital environment cannot be stabilized by only adhering to future deorbiting restrictions; active cleanup is necessary to halt the current accumulation tendency.

In-orbit servicing technologies, which concentrate on repairing, refueling, and repurposing existing satellites, are becoming more popular as a complement to ADR. These services greatly contribute to a more sustainable orbital economy by prolonging the operational lifetime of satellites, which effectively lowers the frequency of new launches and, in turn, the rate of debris creation. However, many of these technological solutions remain prohibitively expensive, requiring significant investment. To make them viable, creative financing strategies are essential,such as establishing dedicated funds contributed by satellite operators or enforcing penalties for non-compliance with disposal regulations. These approaches could help share the financial burden and incentivize more responsible behavior in orbit. The issue of legacy debris is directly addressed by the development of both ADR and in-orbit servicing, which represents a required transition toward a proactive and restorative approach to orbital management.

Policy, Governance, and International Collaboration

Strong international cooperation and sound policy are essential for managing space debris. Guidelines like the IADC's 25-year deorbiting rule must become universally enforced standards. Crucially, comprehensive Space Traffic Management (STM) systems are needed to coordinate launches, manage orbital slots, and enforce safe separation distances, reducing collisions in congested orbits. This requires urgent action due to the growing number of commercial space actors.⁷

End-of-Life Protocols must be strictly enforced, mandating safe deorbiting or graveyard orbits. Finally, public-private partnerships, like those involving the European Space Agency (ESA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), play a vital role in ensuring space remains a sustainable and accessible resource. By combining government oversight with private-sector innovation and funding, these collaborations help accelerate the development and deployment of effective debris mitigation and removal strategies.

Commercial Opportunities and Industry Outlook

While space debris presents a serious challenge, it has also created new business opportunities and fostered industry specialization in orbital sustainability. From debris tracking and mitigation technologies to active removal services, a growing sector is emerging to address these risks. By quickly developing capture techniques and deorbiting platforms, companies specializing in Active Debris Removal (ADR) are turning cleanup into a profitable service sector. Comparably, the commercial repair, refueling, and life-extension services provided by In-Orbit Servicing (IOS), a growing industry, promise to lessen the financial strain on replacement launches. In addition to providing physical services, commercial companies are actively working to improve tracking and monitoring systems. They are creating better sensor technologies, sophisticated analytics, and machine learning models to enhance collision prediction and cataloguing, which is an essential service for all satellite operators.

The market for lighter, more durable materials and propulsion systems made for low debris generation and dependable end-of-life disposal is being driven by the need for greener missions, which has sparked technological innovation in spacecraft design. The space industry is progressively implementing Education and Awareness initiatives to assist these expanding sectors, encouraging a culture of responsibility among engineers, designers, and operators. The vision for the future indicates an integrated space economy where market demand for safe and sustainable orbital operations will make debris management a key and lucrative component of mission planning rather than just a regulatory burden. The direction is clear: the industry is steadily moving toward a model where commercial collaboration, regulatory frameworks, and advanced technologies work together to support the long-term sustainability of the space environment. This integrated approach is becoming essential for maintaining safe and reliable access to orbit in the decades ahead.

Have you heard about the Vigil mission? Found out about it in this interview

References and Further Reading

1. Yozkalach, Kadir. "Space debris as a threat to space sustainability." Central European Review of Economics and Management (CEREM) 7, no. 1 (2023): 63-75.
2. Leal Filho, Walter, Ismaila Rimi Abubakar, Julian D. Hunt, and Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis. "Managing space debris: Risks, mitigation measures, and sustainability challenges." Sustainable Futures (2025): 100849.
3. Nozawa, Wataru, Kenichi Kurita, Tetsuya Tamaki, and Shunsuke Managi. "To what extent will space debris impact the economy?." Space Policy 66 (2023): 101580.
4. Khan, Mohammed Vaseeq Hussain, and Efstratios L. Ntantis. "Space Debris: Overview and mitigation strategies." In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Research, Technology and Education of Space, H-Space, pp. 25-26. 2024.
5. Jia, G. U. O., P. A. N. G. Zhaojun, and D. U. Zhonghua. "Optimal planning for a multi-debris active removal mission with a partial debris capture strategy." Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 36, no. 6 (2023): 256-265.
6. Mark, C. Priyant, and Surekha Kamath. "Review of active space debris removal methods." Space policy 47 (2019): 194-206.
7. Runnels, Michael B. "Protecting earth and space industries from orbital debris: Implementing the outer space treaty to fill the regulatory vacuum in the FCC's orbital debris guidelines." American Business Law Journal 60, no. 1 (2023): 175-229.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.