How Wavefront Error Impacts Space Telescope Performance

It is essential that strict wavefront error (WFE) budgets be met when designing and manufacturing space telescope optics. These performance thresholds dictate a telescope’s ability to clearly and accurately monitor Earth from orbit or capture images of distant celestial objects.

How Wavefront Error Impacts Space Telescope Performance

Image Credit: Vadim Sadovski/Shutterstock.com 

Rather than simply focusing on precision, optical manufacturers must maintain ultra-low surface figure and irregularity to ensure mission-critical reliability in the extreme conditions of space.

This article features practical insights from the manufacturing floor, highlighting how Avantier delivers precision optics that meet the stringent WFE budgets for both small- and large-scale space systems.

Understanding Wavefront Error Budgets (WFEs)

WFEs are system-level allocations of permissible optical aberrations across the components in an optical path. These budgets are generally expressed in nanometers RMS and include contributions from:

  • Optical surface figure and irregularity
  • Thermal and mechanical deformation
  • Alignment tolerances
  • Coating-induced stress

Manufacturers are responsible for ensuring a minimal WFE contribution for each component to ensure the entire system is kept within spec. These are typically under λ/20 or λ/50 at 633 nm.

Manufacturing Challenges in Meeting WFE Budgets

Tight Surface Figure Tolerances

The achievement of ultra-precise surface figure accuracy is typically the most significant contributor to total WFE. It is important that optics conform to highly specific shapes with nanometer-level accuracy, including spherical, aspheric, and off-axis parabolas.

Avantier leverages a combination of sub-aperture tools, computer-controlled polishing (CCP), and deterministic figuring guided by interferometric metrology to meet surface figure targets without compromising edge or slope transitions.

Controlling Optical Surface Irregularity

Surface irregularity can scatter light and degrade imaging performance, most notably in terms of high-frequency errors. These are often the most difficult part of the spec to effectively manage.

Using magnetorheological finishing (MRF) and ion beam figuring (IBF), Avantier successfully eliminates mid- and high-spatial-frequency errors without introducing new artifacts. This approach is key to maintaining a uniform, clean optical surface.

Managing Coating-Induced Deformation

Thin-film optical coatings are key to reflectivity or transmission, but these coatings can warp optics due to residual stress, resulting in subtly distorted wavefronts.

Avantier simulates coating stress during design, applying symmetrical or balanced coatings wherever possible. In-situ monitoring also enables the early detection and correction of distortions.

Material Selection for Thermal Stability

Materials exhibiting poor thermal behavior can potentially shift figure under orbital temperature changes, exceeding WFE tolerances after launch.

Avantier recommends using ultra-low CTE substrates, such as Zerodur®, ULE®, or SiC, for space-bound optics. The company verifies substrate performance via environmental testing and finite element thermal modeling.

Verifying Wavefront Quality with Advanced Metrology

It is only possible to achieve nanometer-level surface precision with equally precise measurement tools. To ensure this, Avantier uses:

  • Phase-shifting interferometry for full-aperture WFE measurement
  • Custom CGHs or deflectometry for off-axis and freeform optics
  • Stitching profilometry for aspheres and large optics

Where required, measurements are performed in a controlled environment designed to simulate space-bound thermal and vacuum conditions.

Partnering with Designers on WFE Budget Allocation

Early collaboration between system engineers and optical manufacturers is key to project efficiency.

Reviewing the full wavefront error budget in partnership with its clients allows Avantier to suggest trade-offs based on practical manufacturing capabilities, for example, relaxing certain specs to improve alignment tolerances.

Conclusion

More than just precision polishing is necessary to accommodate wavefront error budgets in space telescope optics. A closed-loop process of design-for-manufacturing, advanced metrology, and deep material knowledge is required.

Avantier offers the tools and expertise to ensure that every optic delivered meets the performance targets of the mission in question, from launch to orbit.

Acknowledgments

Produced from materials originally authored by Avantier Inc.

Image

This information has been sourced, reviewed, and adapted from materials provided by Avantier Inc.

For more information on this source, please visit Avantier Inc.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Avantier Inc.. (2026, February 12). How Wavefront Error Impacts Space Telescope Performance. AZoQuantum. Retrieved on February 12, 2026 from https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=677.

  • MLA

    Avantier Inc.. "How Wavefront Error Impacts Space Telescope Performance". AZoQuantum. 12 February 2026. <https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=677>.

  • Chicago

    Avantier Inc.. "How Wavefront Error Impacts Space Telescope Performance". AZoQuantum. https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=677. (accessed February 12, 2026).

  • Harvard

    Avantier Inc.. 2026. How Wavefront Error Impacts Space Telescope Performance. AZoQuantum, viewed 12 February 2026, https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=677.

Ask A Question

Do you have a question you'd like to ask regarding this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.