Editorial Feature

Why We Need Generalized Quantum Standards

Generalized quantum standards are becoming increasingly crucial to ensure the compatibility and reliability of quantum systems. However, the development of generalized quantum standards has distinctive complexities due to the unique nature of quantum systems. This article discusses why generalized quantum standards are important, what the complexities and challenges behind such generalized standards are, and the role of the National Physical Laboratory in tackling these challenges.

Generalized Quantum Standards, Generalized Quantum Standards

Image Credit: metamorworks/Shutterstock.com

The Challenges of Standardization

Quantum mechanics, with its principles of superposition and entanglement, introduces a level of uncertainty and complexity that traditional standards struggle to encapsulate. Standardizing quantum phenomena requires a departure from classical methodologies and developing a new set of principles that can accommodate the peculiarities of quantum mechanics.

One of the primary challenges in creating generalized quantum standards is the inherent fragility of quantum states. Quantum bits, or qubits, are very sensitive to their environment, making them susceptible to errors caused by temperature fluctuations and electromagnetic interference. Moreover, the diversity of quantum technologies adds another layer of complexity. Quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum sensing have distinct requirements, making it challenging to devise a one-size-fits-all set of standards. A nuanced approach that caters to the unique demands of each application is essential for fostering the growth of the quantum industry.

National Physical Laboratory: Pioneering Quantum Standards

Amidst these challenges, the National Physical Laboratory has emerged as a key player in the pursuit of generalized quantum standards. Situated at the forefront of scientific research, the NPL is actively engaged in developing frameworks that can underpin the diverse facets of quantum technologies.

One of the key areas of focus for the NPL is quantum communication. Quantum key distribution (QKD), a secure method for exchanging cryptographic keys, relies on the principles of quantum mechanics. Establishing standards for QKD is paramount for ensuring the security and interoperability of quantum communication networks. The NPL's efforts in this domain involve defining protocols, measurement methodologies, and calibration techniques that can be universally adopted.

Similarly, in quantum computing, the NPL is contributing to the establishment of benchmarks for quantum processors and developing metrics that can assess the computational capabilities of quantum processors, enabling a fair and consistent comparison across different platforms. Moreover, by establishing benchmarks for precision and accuracy in quantum sensors, the NPL aims to facilitate the adoption of quantum technologies in real-world applications.

The Need for Quantum Standards

The need for generalized quantum standards extends beyond the technical intricacies of quantum technologies. As quantum systems transition from experimental prototypes to practical applications, the absence of standards poses significant obstacles since, without standardized measures, quantum devices from different manufacturers may operate on incompatible platforms, hindering the seamless integration of quantum technologies into existing systems.

Standardization is not merely a technical requirement but a strategic necessity to foster collaboration and drive the quantum industry forward. For instance, in a recent study on quantum technology standardization, researchers emphasized the critical need for Generalized Quantum Standards (GQS). The study, conducted by the CEN-CENELEC Focus Group on Quantum Technologies (FGQT), highlighted the early stage of quantum technology standardization and the emergence of supply chains for quantum technologies.

The researchers emphasized that GQS would play a pivotal role in structuring and accelerating research infrastructures, rationalizing market development, and fostering interoperability. With quantum technologies evolving rapidly, the call for coordinated standardization efforts becomes increasingly essential to avoid inefficiencies, ensure compatibility, and facilitate the seamless integration of quantum technologies into existing systems. The study underscores the importance of GQS in addressing the challenges posed by the diverse and dynamic landscape of quantum technologies.

Problems with the Lack of Standards

The lack of standards can impede the trust and credibility associated with quantum technologies. As these technologies become integral to sensitive applications such as secure communication and critical computations, stakeholders demand assurance in the reliability and security of quantum systems. Standardization provides a framework for validation, assuring users that quantum processes adhere to established norms and guidelines.

The Future of Quantum Standards

As quantum technologies continue their rapid evolution, the establishment of generalized quantum standards remains an ongoing journey. The complexities inherent in quantum systems demand a dynamic and adaptive approach to standardization. Organizations like the National Physical Laboratory, with their commitment to cutting-edge research, play a pivotal role in shaping the quantum standards landscape.

The imperative for quantum standards extends beyond the scientific community. Policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers must collaborate to create a robust framework that not only addresses the current challenges but also anticipates the future needs of the quantum ecosystem.

Conclusion

In conclusion, generalized quantum standards are necessary to develop quantum-based technologies and applications since a lack of standards can affect the credibility of such technologies. However, challenges like the fragility of quantum states and the sensitive nature of quantum bits, or qubits, pose significant hindrances to the generalization of quantum standards.

The National Physical Laboratory (NPL) is tackling such challenges by establishing standards for quantum key distribution (QKD), which will help ensure quantum communication network security. Moreover, NPL's contribution in establishing standards for quantum processors is a significant step towards generalized quantum standards that will enable consistency across multiple quantum platforms.

More from AZoQuantum: How Cryogenics is Unlocking Quantum Computing

References and Further Reading

van Deventer, O., Spethmann, N., Loeffler, M., Amoretti, M., van den Brink, R., Bruno, N., ... & Wilhelm-Mauch, F. K. (2022). Towards European standards for quantum technologies. EPJ Quantum Technology. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-022-00150-1

Kaneko, N. H., Nakamura, S., & Okazaki, Y. (2016). A review of the quantum current standard. Measurement Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/3/032001

Flowers, J. (2004). The route to atomic and quantum standards. Science. https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1102156

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. (2019, February 13). Testing the Best-Yet Theory of Nature. AZoNano. Retrieved on November 20, 2023 from https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=18224

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Taha Khan

Written by

Taha Khan

Taha graduated from HITEC University Taxila with a Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering. During his studies, he worked on several research projects related to Mechanics of Materials, Machine Design, Heat and Mass Transfer, and Robotics. After graduating, Taha worked as a Research Executive for 2 years at an IT company (Immentia). He has also worked as a freelance content creator at Lancerhop. In the meantime, Taha did his NEBOSH IGC certification and expanded his career opportunities.  

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Khan, Taha. (2023, December 13). Why We Need Generalized Quantum Standards. AZoQuantum. Retrieved on May 02, 2024 from https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=478.

  • MLA

    Khan, Taha. "Why We Need Generalized Quantum Standards". AZoQuantum. 02 May 2024. <https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=478>.

  • Chicago

    Khan, Taha. "Why We Need Generalized Quantum Standards". AZoQuantum. https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=478. (accessed May 02, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Khan, Taha. 2023. Why We Need Generalized Quantum Standards. AZoQuantum, viewed 02 May 2024, https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=478.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.